The Four in Balance Monitor  is an annual research report, commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Education. It gives educators and other interested parties insight into the use and benefits of ICT in education. What trends can be distinguished? What do teachers and school managers think about the pedagogical possibilities of ICT? What is the situation regarding the ICT skills of teachers and pupils? 

As an ICT-E consultant I appreciate its longitudinal dimension: it provides realistic insights and shows developments and trends in educational practice (see e.g. this previous blogpost). Driven by my current interest in the use of IWBs I selected the following paragraphs:

Effectiveness of interactive whiteboards uncertain
In the United Kingdom, a great deal of research has been done on the learning effects of interactive whiteboards compared to blackboards (Somekh et al., 2007). Although it has been shown that using an interactive whiteboard can have a positive effect on learning results, the occurrence of such an effect depends on more factors than solely the use of this technology.

Benefits of using ICT
It has been established that after two years of lessons with an interactive whiteboard, pupils are between ten weeks and five months further in maths than pupils who worked with a blackboard. This applies to pupils who are already good at maths. Pupils who are behind in maths in fact profit far less from the use of an interactive whiteboard. Paradoxically enough, the use of interactive whiteboards in chemistry lessons has the opposite effect;
pupils who performed badly in the first instance caught up amply with their more “chemistry-oriented” classmates. These examples show that it is important to ask not only whether interactive whiteboards (and other ICT applications) are effective but also to consider who benefits from their use and under what circumstances.

Instruction and interaction
One advantage of using interactive whiteboards that is often mentioned is that they can give an interactive impetus to whole-class teaching. Although interactive whiteboards offer options for involving pupils in the lesson more actively – because they can use the whiteboard themselves, give presentations, do exercises, and make a contribution by means of voting panels – in practice these options are only used to a very small extent (Levy, 2002, Fisser, 2008).
Small-scale experiments with work on an interactive whiteboard show promising results. Pupils who work in small independent groups on maths problems, for example, are active, motivated, and involved when they work together on problems using an interactive whiteboard. They also get better marks for maths (Coetsier, 2009). A study of history teaching using with an interactive whiteboard show that pupils who used it were better able to apply their historical knowledge at other times and places (De Kock, 2008).

The results of research on the use of interactive whiteboards support the general principles for effective use of ICT. If the teacher has digital
learning materials that are of real practical use and has been properly trained in using them and in the pedagogical possibilities, then an
interactive whiteboard can be beneficial for the teaching/learning. If these conditions are not met, then there is little or no added value in using an interactive whiteboard.

These findings match well with conclusions  I reached in my metastudy of research reports on IWBs in Education (Koenraad, 2008)

 The English version of the ICT-Monitor is available for download here